Shifter 对比 大规模
Looking for a Massive alternative? We counted the residential IPs each network had live and answering in five markets. Shifter led every one, from 61% more in the United States to fourteen times more in France, at 85% less per GB.
受信赖于 50,000+ 全球客户
A deeper pool at a fraction of the rate
Lowest published rate per GB from each provider. Massive's $4.90 is its Pro tier; a 10 GB buyer pays $8.00.
| 月流量 | Shifter | 大规模 | 您节省 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 入门 | $10 5 GB at $2.00/GB | $80 10 GB at $8.00/GB | 75% |
| 100 GB | $100 $1.00/GB | ~$550 ~$5.50/GB Scaler | 82% |
| 最优费率 | $0.75/GB from 200 GB | $4.90/GB Pro tier | 85% |
测试期间在线的 IP
Distinct IPs each network had live and reachable at test time, not the size of its total network. Residential IPs rotate all day, so both providers serve far more addresses across 24 hours.
逐国完整指标
Pick a country to see the complete measurement, including the numbers that did not go our way.
| 指标 | Shifter | 大规模 |
|---|---|---|
| 已发送请求数 | 250,000 | 250,000 |
| 测试期间的在线 IP | 136,667 | 84,827 |
| 独立网络数 (ASNs) | 1,606 | 1,138 |
| 独立城市数 | 5,813 | 5,170 |
| 平均延迟 | 364 ms | 539 ms |
| 成功率 | 99.8% | 100% |
Shifter served 61% more live US IPs, 136,667 against 84,827, across 1,606 networks against 1,138, and answered in 364 ms against 539 ms. Massive's US result is its strongest by some distance. A 100 GB month costs $100 with Shifter against roughly $550.
How we measured this
Every provider in this series receives the identical test: plain HTTP to an IP echo service, one fresh connection per request, 1,000 concurrent, 10 second timeout, and fixed volumes of 250,000 requests in the United States, 100,000 in the United Kingdom, 80,000 in France, 70,000 in Canada and 60,000 in Germany. One connection per request means one fresh exit per request, so distinct addresses map directly to the reachable pool.
Massive's run was the cleanest in the series. Every country returned effectively everything we sent, and geo accuracy came back at 99.8% or better, so none of these counts are shaped by failed or misrouted requests.
Both providers ran plain HTTP, so the latency figures compare directly.
What these numbers mean
Every count on this page is the number of IPs that were live and reachable at the time of the test, not the size of either provider's network. Residential IPs rotate constantly as real devices come online and drop off, so across a full day both networks serve far more addresses than a single window can capture. What limits a crawl is how many respond at the same moment, which is what this measures.
为什么使用 Shifter 住宅代理？
A larger live pool in all five markets
61% more in the United States, 83% more in Germany, 134% more in the United Kingdom, 245% more in Canada, and fifteen times more in France.
Wider network spread everywhere
1,606 US networks against 1,138, 148 French against 28, 276 German against 202. Anti-bot systems key on the network an address sits on, so spread does more than raw count.
85% less per GB
$0.75 against $4.90 at each provider's best published rate, and Massive's entry tier is $8.00 per GB.
Usable French coverage
33,581 live French addresses across 148 operators against 2,239 across 28. On French traffic at volume these are not comparable products.
常见问题
Common questions about how we benchmarked 大规模.
Yes, and consistently so. Medians ran 429 ms to 583 ms across the five countries, and its French and Canadian results were quick enough to edge or approach ours. Speed is the strongest thing about this network.
The same speed, a sixth of the price
A deeper live pool in every market we measured, across more networks, at $0.75 per GB against $4.90.