基于实测评分的代理服务商评测
大多数代理评测根据主观印象和联盟佣金对服务商排名。我们的评分来自对每个网络一视同仁的测试，因此每项结论背后的数据均可核查，包括对我们自身不利的数据。
Shifter 评测
The widest network spread and the lowest rate we measured, on a pool within 10% of the deepest.
Bright Data 评测
The most complete proxy platform on the market, priced for buyers with a procurement department.
Oxylabs 评测
A large, very reliable network at a price that only works above a terabyte a month.
Decodo 评测
The mid-market all-rounder: deep, reliable and self-serve, priced above the value end.
SOAX 评测
Precise targeting, let down by uneven reliability and one of the steepest price ladders.
IPRoyal 评测
Dependable, with traffic that never expires, but roughly half the pool of the leaders.
Webshare 评测
The deepest pool we have measured, cheaply sold, with the slowest responses in the series.
Massive 评测
Quick, consistent and well engineered, on a mid-sized pool priced at the top of the market.
Infatica 评测
A deep pool behind a gateway that refuses plain HTTP, priced for enterprise volume.
Proxy-Seller 评测
Deep, quick and reliable, held back by a flat ladder and one account per country.
NodeMaven 评测
The filtering pitch is coherent; the filtered pool measured small, slow and unreliable.
Evomi 评测
A clean, consistent network attached to the smallest pool in the series.
DataImpulse 评测
The value pick: flat $1 per GB, no subscription, and a mid-sized pool to match.
ProxyEmpire 评测
Cheap and quick when it answers, but a third of our requests never came back.
Proxy Cheap 评测
A flat rate near the top of the market, on a gateway that answered barely a tenth of an ordinary plain HTTP test.
Byteful 评测
Well spread and fairly priced, with the least consistent completion of any working network.
评分构建方式
八项评分标准中有六项来自我们自己的测量：在线 IP 数量、网络分布、成功率、响应时间、公布的每 GB 价格和国家/地区覆盖范围，均在所有已测试网络中归一化处理。功能性和透明度为主观评判项，合计仅占总分的十分之一。Shifter 也销售代理，这正是我们公开测试方法并通过计算而非主观评定得出评分的原因。