Shifter vs Evomi
An Evomi alternative with far deeper coverage. Our five country benchmark found Shifter serving between two and five times more live residential IPs than Evomi, from $0.75/GB against their $2.20 floor.
Utilizado por 50,000+ clientes em todo o mundo
Recurso por recurso comparação
| Recurso | Shifter | Evomi |
|---|---|---|
| Live IPs measured (US) | 136,667 | 25,320 |
| Live IPs measured (UK) | 53,506 | 15,139 |
| Live IPs measured (Germany) | 22,005 | 8,999 |
| Preço Inicial | $2.00/GB | $3.75/GB (8 GB plan) |
| Melhor Preço | $0.75/GB | $2.20/GB at 5 TB |
| Protocolos | HTTP / HTTPS / SOCKS5 | HTTP / HTTPS / SOCKS5 |
| Geo-Targeting | Nível de cidade (mais de 195 países) | Country, region and city |
| Rotação de IP | Por requisição + Sessões persistentes | Por requisição + Sessões persistentes |
| Pay As You Go | Not offered | $4.00/GB |
| Suporte ao Cliente | 24/7 em todos os planos | chat 24/7 |
Comparação de Preços (por GB)
| Volume | ShifterAté 71% DESATIVADO | Evomi | Você Economiza |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entrada | $10 for 5 GB ($2.00/GB) | $30 for 8 GB ($3.75/GB) | 67% |
| Volume Médio (~100 GB) | $100 ($1.00/GB) | $320 ($3.20/GB) | 69% |
| Scale (250 GB+) | $187 ($0.75/GB) | $750 ($3.00/GB) | 75% |
| Best Rate | $0.75/GB from 200 GB | $2.20/GB at 5 TB | 66% |
Contamos os IPs residenciais ao vivo que Shifter e Evomi entregaram em cinco países, sob um teste idêntico. Veja os números e o método.
Nossa análise completa de Evomi: o que o pool, os preços e o comportamento do gateway somam, pontuados com os mesmos critérios de toda rede que testamos.
Por que usar Shifter proxies residenciais?
Between Two and Five Times More Live IPs
Evomi returned the smallest live pool of any provider in our benchmark. Shifter served 5.4 times more addresses in the United States, 3.5 times more in the United Kingdom and 2.4 times more in Germany during the same test windows.
Cheaper at Every Tier, Not Just at Scale
Evomi's entry plan is $3.75/GB and its floor is $2.20 on a 5 TB commitment. Shifter starts at $2.00 and reaches $0.75 from 200 GB, so the saving runs from roughly 47% at entry to 66% at scale.
Broader Network Spread
Shifter's addresses came from several times more autonomous systems in every country tested. A pool concentrated on few networks is easier for anti-bot systems to recognise and block as a group.
Coverage Where Small Pools Struggle
Evomi held up best in Canada and weakest in the United States, where it served 25,320 live IPs against Shifter's 136,667. If your work is US heavy, that gap is the whole decision.
Reliability Held Up on Both Sides
The difference between the two networks here is coverage and price, not stability.
Simples e transparente preços
Planos mensais fixos com largura de banda incluída. Sem taxas ocultas. Escale conforme seu uso cresce.
Perguntas frequentes
Perguntas comuns sobre migrar de Evomi para Shifter.
In our August 2026 benchmark, 5.4 times larger in the United States, 3.5 times in the United Kingdom, 2.4 times in Germany, 2.2 times in France and 1.8 times in Canada. Full method and tables are at /benchmark/evomi.
Its run was clean and consistent across all five countries. If steady, predictable behaviour matters more to you than pool depth or price, that is a fair reason to consider it.
Roughly 47% at entry volume, 69% around 100 GB a month and 66% at each provider's best published rate. Evomi's cheapest rate also requires a 5 TB commitment, where Shifter's applies from 200 GB.
Because they count IPs that were live and reachable during the test rather than every address a network has ever seen. Residential IPs rotate all day, so both providers touch far more addresses over 24 hours. What limits a crawl is how many are online at once.
Get the coverage your crawl needs
Several times more live residential IPs in every country we measured, at a fraction of the cost per GB. Test both on your own targets and compare.